Reviews / 2020
First Do No Harm: the Independent Medicines and Medical Devices Safety Review
Baroness Cumberlege · work from 2018 · published 2020
What this was
Review of harm from hormone pregnancy tests, sodium valproate in pregnancy, and pelvic mesh. It found that patients, mostly women, were not listened to, and that the system was not set up to spot harm from a product once it was in use. The review made nine recommendations.
Why it sits in the hub
The Patient Safety Commissioner exists because of this review. The redress agency it asked for was not created. The Hughes report in 2024 returned to compensation for valproate and mesh.
Findings
Finding 1
Women were dismissed when they reported harm from a medicine or a device.
Finding 2
The regulator and the NHS did not have the data to see a pattern of harm.
Recommendations in this hub
The source reports 9 recommendations or essential actions. The notes below are a paraphrase, not the official text.
- 1AcceptedGovernment
Apologise to the families affected.
- 2AcceptedGovernment
Appoint a Patient Safety Commissioner.
The role was created. Dash later recommended moving its medicines work to the MHRA and its wider work into a patient-experience function.
- 3Not implementedGovernment
Create an independent redress agency.
Hughes later set out options for valproate and mesh. A single redress agency was not established.
- 4Partly doneMHRA and NHS
Build registries for devices and a clearer record of conflicts of interest and industry payments.
- 5Partly doneMHRA
Reform the MHRA so that it looks harder for harm after a product is in use, with patients in the work.
